xAI blamed an โunauthorized modificationโ for a bug in its AI-powered Grok chatbot that caused Grok to repeatedly refer to โwhite genocide in South Africaโ when invoked in certain contexts on X.
On Wednesday, Grok began replying to dozens of posts on X with information about white genocide in South Africa, even in response to unrelated subjects. The strange replies stemmed from the X account for Grok, which responds to users with AI-generated posts whenever a person tags โ@grok.โ
According to a post Thursday from xAIโs official X account, a change was made Wednesday morning to the Grok botโs system prompt โ the high-level instructions that guide the botโs behavior โ that directed Grok to provide a โspecific responseโ on a โpolitical topic.โ xAI says that the tweak โviolated [its] internal policies and core values,โ and that the company has โconducted a thorough investigation.โ
Itโs the second time xAI has publicly acknowledged an unauthorized change to Grokโs code caused the AI to respond in controversial ways.
In February, Grok briefly censored unflattering mentions of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of xAI and owner of X. Igor Babuschkin, an xAI engineering lead,ย said that Grok had been instructed by a rogue employee to ignore sources that mentioned Musk or Trump spreading misinformation, and that xAI reverted the change as soon as users began pointing it out.
xAI said on Thursday that itโs going to make several changes to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Beginning today, xAI will publish Grokโs system prompts on GitHub as well as a changelog. The company says itโll also โput in place additional checks and measuresโ to ensure that xAI employees canโt modify the system prompt without review and establish a โ24/7 monitoring team to respond to incidents with Grokโs answers that are not caught by automated systems.โ
Despite Muskโs frequent warnings of the dangers ofย AIย goneย unchecked, xAI has a poor AI safety track record. A recent reportย found that Grok would undress photos of women when asked. The chatbot can also beย considerably more crassย than AI like Googleโs Gemini and ChatGPT, cursing without much restraint to speak of.
A study by SaferAI, a nonprofit aiming to improve the accountability of AI labs, found xAI ranks poorly on safety among its peers, owing to itsย โvery weakโ risk management practices. Earlier this month, xAI missed a self-imposed deadlineย to publish a finalized AI safety framework.


