The robot swerved through the cafeteria of Rivianโs Palo Alto office, shelves adorned with chilled canned coffees โ until it didnโt. Five minutes later, a man carefully pushed it out of everyoneโs way, the words โIโm stuckโ flashing yellow on the poor droidโs screen.
It was an inauspicious start to Rivianโs โAutonomy & AI Day,โ a showcase for the companyโs plans to make its vehicles capable of driving themselves. Rivian doesnโt make the cafeteria robot and isnโt responsible for its abilities, but there was a familiar message in its foibles: this stuff is hard.
Hours later, as I rode in a 2025 R1S SUV during my 15-minute demo of Rivianโs new self-described โLarge Driving Model,โ I was reminded of that message.
The EV equipped with the automated-driving software drove myself and two Rivian employees on a switchback route near the companyโs campus. As we glided past Teslaโs engineering office, I noticed a Model S in front of us slow to turn into the rival companyโs lot. The R1S eventually noticed this, too, braking hard just before the Rivian employee nearly intervened.
During my demo drive, there was one actual disengagement. The employee in the driverโs seat took over as we passed through a one-lane section of road due to some tree-trimming. Minor stuff overall. But it wasnโt exactly rare either; I spotted multiple other demo rides that had disengagements too.
The rest of the drive went well enough for software that is not ready to be shipped, especially when you consider that Rivian threw out its old rules-based driver assistance system and adopted an end-to-end approach โ which is how Tesla developed Full Self-Driving (Supervised). It stopped at stoplights, it handled turns, it slowed for speed bumps, all without programmed rules telling it to do these things.
A quiet pivot in 2021
Rivianโs old system โwas all very deterministic, and it was all very structured,โ CEO RJ Scaringe said in an interview Thursday. โEverything that the vehicle did was the result of a prescribed control strategy written by humans.โ
Techcrunch event
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
Scaringe said that when Rivian saw transformer-based artificial intelligence taking off in 2021, he quietly โreconstituted the team and started with a clean sheet and said, letโs design our self-driving platform for an AI-centric world.โ
After spending โa lot of time in the basement,โ Rivian launched the new ground-up driving software in 2024 on its second-generation R1 vehicles, which use Nvidiaโs Orin processors.
Scaringe said it was only recently that his company started to see dramatic progress โonce the data started really pouring in.โ
Rivian is betting it can train its Large Driving Model (LDM) on fleet data so quickly that it will allow the company to roll out what it calls โUniversal Hands-Freeโ driving in early 2026. That means Rivian owners will be able to take their hands off the wheel on 3.5 million miles of roads in the U.S. and Canada (so long as there are visible painted lines). In the back half of 2026 Rivian will allow โpoint-to-pointโ driving, or the consumer version of the demo we received Thursday.
The โeyes offโ to โhands offโ challenge
By the end of 2026, after Rivian has started shipping its smaller, more affordable R2 SUVs, it will ditch the Nvidia chips and outfit those vehicles with a new custom autonomy computer unveiled Thursday. That computer, plus a lidar sensor, will eventually allow drivers to take their hands and eyes off the road. True autonomy โ where a driver doesnโt have to worry about re-taking control of the vehicle โ lies well beyond that and will largely depend on how fast Rivian can train its LDM.
This rollout introduces a near-term challenge for Rivian. The new autonomy computer and lidar wonโt be ready until months after the R2 goes on sale. If customers want a vehicle that can handle eyes-off driving (or more), theyโll have to wait. But the R2 is a crucial product for Rivian, and the company needs it to sell well โ especially in the wake of declining sales of its first-generation vehicles.
โWhen tech is moving as fast as it is, thereโs always going to be some level of obsolescence, and so what we want to do here is to be really directโ about whatโs coming, Scaringe said. The early R2s will still get Rivianโs promised โpoint-to-pointโ driving, which will be based on the new software and will be hands-off but not eyes-off.
โSo [if] youโre buying an R2 and you buy it in the first nine months, itโs just going to be more constrained,โ he said. โI think what will happen is some customers will say โthat matters a lot to me, and Iโm going to wait.โ And some will say โI want the newest, best things now, and Iโm going to get the R2 now, and maybe Iโll trade it in a year or two, and Iโll get the next version later. Fortunately, thereโs so much demand backlog for R2 that we think, by being upfront with this, customers can make the decision themselves.โ
โIn a perfect world, everything times at the same time, but the timeline of the vehicle and the timeline of the autonomy platform are just not perfectly aligned,โ he said.
When I first interviewed Scaringe in 2018, before Rivian even showed what its vehicles looked like, he shared a goal that still rattles around my head. He wanted to make Rivianโs vehicles so capable of driving themselves that: โif you go for a hike, and you start at one point and you finish at another point, you have the vehicle meet you at the end of the trail.โ
It was the kind of pie-in-the-sky promise about self-driving cars that was all the rage seven years ago, but it stuck with me at least because it was something that felt true to Rivianโs whole brand of aspirational adventure.
Scaringe told me Thursday he still thinks itโs possible for Rivian to enable a use case like that in the next few years. It certainly wonโt happen until the company tests and builds its more-capable R2 vehicles, which is at least a year away in a best-case scenario.
โWe could [do that]. Itโs not been a huge focus,โ he said. That could change as the company gets closer to level 4 autonomy, though, since by then the company will have its LDM trained on trickier roads without guiding features like lane lines.
โThen, it becomes a bit of a like, whatโs the ODD [operational design domain]? Dirt roads, off road? Easy,โ he said. Just donโt expect a Rivian driving itself up Hellโs Gate in Moab.
โWeโre not putting any resources into rock crawling autonomously,โ he said. โBut in terms of getting to the trail head? For sure.โ


